Martin V. Saffer, Pocahontas County Commissioner
 
About the Background
Commissioner
Introduction

County News
County Forum
Photos
Links

Profile
Contact Me

Back to Main

Back to Topics List Reply

Drinking Water and Gas

Author Message
Martin Saffer
Sep 18, 2011
5:02 am
Drinking Water and Gas

DEP inspections show more shale well cement problems
By Laura Legere (Staff Writer)
Published: September 18, 2011

At the recent Shale Gas Insight conference in Philadelphia, the CEO of one of the largest Marcellus Shale drilling companies in Pennsylvania was unequivocal in his message that methane contamination of drinking water supplies from faulty gas wells is at an end.

"Problem identified; problem solved," Chesapeake Energy's Chairman Aubrey McClendon declared.

But violations data released last week by the state Department of Environmental Protection show problems persist with the cemented strings of steel casing meant to protect groundwater from gas and fluids in Marcellus wells.

In August, DEP inspectors found defective or inadequate casing or cement at eight Marcellus wells, including Hess Corp.'s Davidson well in Scott Twp., Wayne County - the first casing violation found in the county where only a handful of Marcellus wells have been drilled.

During the first eight months of 2011, 65 Marcellus wells were cited for faulty casing and cementing practices - one more than was recorded in all of 2010.

Casing and cementing violations do not necessarily indicate that gas has migrated or will migrate into drinking water supplies, and methane is present in many water wells in Pennsylvania from natural pathways unrelated to gas drilling. But in the three dozen instances when methane has migrated into water supplies from gas wells in Northeast Pennsylvania, cement flaws have been identified by state regulators as a primary pathway for the gas.

In his comments at the conference, Mr. McClendon credited an "updated and customized casing system" included in stronger state oil and gas casing and cementing regulations for "preventing new cases of gas migration."

The increase in casing and cementing violations reflects the state's increased attention to the issue, especially since the regulations were updated in February. The steady pace of new violations - an average of eight new wells a month have been cited for casing, cement or leaking gas violations this year - also indicates the complexity of the problem in a state where the geology is neither uniform nor predictable.

DEP Secretary Michael Krancer, who was not present for Mr. McClendon's statement, said he could not respond to it directly when asked about it at the shale conference.

"One case of methane migration or well contamination is one case too many," he said.

Most of the casing and cement violations recorded this summer became evident to inspectors when bubbles rose from between the cemented casing strings in water pooled at the well sites or when combustible gas was detected with meters at the surface, according to notes in the violation reports posted by the department online.

The department considers bubbling or escaping gas at the surface an indication of problems below.

In June, July and August, bubbling or escaping gas was noted during inspections of Marcellus wells in Wayne, Wyoming, Susquehanna, Bradford and Lycoming counties in the northeast and northcentral region. The wells' operators include Chesapeake, Hess, Exco Resources, Williams Production and XTO Energy.

The inspector's notes from the Hess Davidson well on August 18 confirmed bubbling outside of one of the casing strings and that "Hess indicated (the) bubbling is methane." The company was directed to develop a plan within 30 days to "remediate (the) problem of defective cement."

Hess spokeswoman Maripat Sexton said the company is working with DEP to resolve the issue.

"There does not appear to be any adverse impacts," she said.

Contact the writer: llegere@timesshamrock.com

Jeffrey Hall
Sep 18, 2011
6:10 am
Re: Drinking Water and Gas

"There does not appear to be any adverse impacts," this article concludes. Part of the regulations should include that these horses' behinds drink the water from the supplies around these methane gas leaking Marcellus wells.

Martin Saffer
Sep 18, 2011
6:59 am
Re: Drinking Water and Gas

The RN we spoke with in Wetzel County told us her drinking water was bad and that she and her child were having reactions from the gas fumes from the large storage area about a 1/4 mile from her home. She said the DEP had investigated and that "they were working with the Gas Company" on the issues. Not with her. The gas company said that without prior testing "Gee Whiz" it was impossible to say what her water was like before. Judge, when the entire State Legislature and Administrative agencies are in bed with gas...it is no wonder there is no room under the covers for the citizens who are suffering.

Trish McNaull
Sep 18, 2011
11:37 am
Re: Drinking Water and Gas

On July 28, 2011, the EPA proposed a suite of regulations that would reduce air pollution from oil and gas production. This proposal is based on proven technology and best practices that the industry is currently using and includes the first federal air standards for fracking.
Current techniques allow volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to escape into the air in routine fracking and re-fracking of wells - Methane is the primary greenhouse gas and is 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide in causing ground level ozone/smog responsible for respiratory ills such as asthma and bronchitis, and damage to crops. Oil and natural gas production and processing accounts for nearly 40% of all US methane emissions. The proposal also targets benzene, which causes cancer and irreversible health effects.
The fracking processes are the source of an estimated 500,000 tons of VOC emissions each year. This includes 9,700 completions of new wells annually that are not controlled, and 12,000 re-completions that are not controlled. These emissions are not the result of accidents - they are routine and occur during a stage of well completion known as "flowback," when fracturing fluids, water and reservoir gas come to the surface at high velocity and volume, and lasts for up to 10 days. Glycol dehydrators(used to remove excess water from gas) are considered "small" if they emit less than 1 ton of benzene per year. Pneumatic controllers that maintain levels, pressure and temperatures at wells, plants and compressor stations are gas-driven and may release natural gas that includes VOCs and methane with every valve movement/continuously. The EPA proposes to limit gas emissions from controllers to 6 cubic feet of gas per hour.

MY POINT here is that all of these toxic gas emissions are currently acknowledged by the EPA and the gas industry as part of routine fracking WITHOUT incident or accident - we can expect our air quality to undergo dramatic impact that will affect the health of the people of the county, that will impact livestock and crop production, and will make the county undesirable for tourism or new homes. Life as we know it in Pocahontas County will be forever changed for the benefit of a handful of landowners who will get rich.

normanalderman
Sep 18, 2011
12:20 pm
Re: Drinking Water and Gas

Pictures, please!

Back to Topics List Reply

Copyright © 2012 Martin V. Saffer